WWW WWW.SUPPORTMUSIC.COM

Download the NEW SupportMusic Glossary

May 01, 2008
FOCUS ON BUDGET: Reverse Economics – Developing a Fiscal Case for Your Music Program (Part 2 of 2)
April 02, 2008
FOCUS ON BUDGET: Reverse Economics - Developing a Fiscal Case for Your Music Program (Part 1 of 2)
March 01, 2008
Focus on Issues & Decision-making: Educational Reform Movements - Tax Vouchers and Their Impact on Music Education Programs
February 01, 2008
ARTS ADVOCACY LESSONS FROM THE 2008 IOWA PRESIDENTIAL CAUCUS: #1 Take-Away ñ Let the Candidates Hear From You!
January 03, 2008
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: NJ Arts Education Census Project Offers Model for Other States
December 01, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: Advocate for Music Education
October 30, 2007
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: Music Education Research 101, Part II
September 17, 2007
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: Music Education Research 101, Part 1
August 07, 2007
FOCUS ON ISSUES AND DECISIONMAKING: Do Your Elected Officials View Music Education as a National Priority?
July 13, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: American Symphony Orchestra League Launches Historic Statement of Common Cause to Support In-School Music Education
June 03, 2007
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Music & Arts Education is Essential to Development of Creative Economy & 21st Century Skills
June 03, 2007
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Music & Arts Education is Essential to Development of Creative Economy & 21st Century Skills
May 03, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: Think Globally, Act Locally ñ and Why Reading This is NOT an Advocacy Action
March 21, 2007
FOFCUS ON BUDGET: FTE and the Staffing Ratio, Part 2 ñ The Music Teacher
February 21, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: From Anytown, USA to Washington, DC . . . All Music Advocacy Is Local
January 17, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: How to Create School Board Support for Music Programs
December 15, 2006
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Why Music Technology Enhances Student Success
November 16, 2006
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: These Parents Made A Difference ñ You Can Too!
October 18, 2006
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: The Study Hall Game
September 27, 2006
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: The Music Administrator, Part 2 of 2
September 20, 2006
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: The Music Administrator, Part 1 of 2
September 08, 2006
Back-To-School Primer: The Local Music Coalition
August 30, 2006
Focus on Budget: FTE ñ A Case Study on Teacher Seniority & The Fallacy of Average
August 24, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making:Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 3 of 3
August 15, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making:Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 2 of 3
August 08, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 1 of 3
August 08, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 1 of 3
August 01, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Trimester System and Year-Round Schools
July 18, 2006
NEWS FLASH!! CA Advocates Secure Historic Funding for Arts Education
June 30, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 10 of a series Decision Time!
June 22, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 9 of a series Three Perspectives on Block Scheduling
June 13, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 8 of a series Two Options for Four-Period Block Scheduling
June 06, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 7 of a series Block Scheduling and the Music Student
May 30, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 6 of a series Rotating Schedules
May 18, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 5 of a series Two Options for 7-Period Scheduling
May 08, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 4 of a series Scheduling Myths & the Grades 9-10 "Bottleneck"
April 27, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform movement: Part 3 of a series Scheduling & The Traditional Six-Day Period
April 19, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform: Part 2 of a series Scheduling
April 12, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 1 of a series An Overview & Some Advice
April 04, 2006
FOCUS ON BUDGET: Actual FTE Value & Individual Student Load
March 27, 2006
PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS: A Slippery Slope
March 15, 2006
Music Advocacy 101: Do YOU Have "The Right Stuff"?
March 01, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Who Really Calls The Shots?
February 16, 2006
Focus on Budget: FTE and The Danger of Using Averages
February 07, 2006
Focus on Budget: Identifying Potential & "Hidden" Music Budget Cuts
January 24, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Music - Curricular, Co-curricular or Extra-curricular?
January 10, 2006
Focus on Budget: FTE and the Staffing Ratio
January 04, 2006
Focus on Students: Advocacy and the Music Student
December 27, 2005
Focus on Budget: How to Develop & Use Impact Statements
December 20, 2005
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION-MAKING: Central and Site-based Management
December 05, 2005
Focus on Budget: How "Average" FTE Value Creates Budget Problems
November 28, 2005
Focus on Coalition Building: The Public School Music Participation Survey
November 21, 2005
Focus on Coalition Building: 8 Strategic Errors in Music Advocacy & How to Correct Them
November 14, 2005
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Is My Music Program Vulnerable to Cuts?
November 07, 2005
Focus on Budget: FTE & Staffing
October 31, 2005
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Putting Students First
October 10, 2005
Decision Making: The Politics of Process
October 04, 2005
SCHOOL BUDGET PRIMER: UNDERSTANDING "FTE"
March 23, 2005
Decisions: Adult or Student-centered?
March 23, 2005
Decisions: Adult or Student-centered?

October 3,2005

SCHOOL BUDGET PRIMER: UNDERSTANDING “FTE”  

This article is the first in a series of articles on school budget definitions, primarily “FTE” or full-time equivalency. Simply put, FTE is a measurement used to establish the financial value of music teachers and music programs.

Understanding FTE will help you – the parents, teachers and other advocates of school music programs – unravel some of the complexities of your school budget process. The terms and concepts presented here are the building blocks used (or, in some cases, neglected) by administrators and school board members as they decide where monies should be allocated and where cuts will be made. Though this “insider” information may seem a little daunting at first, you too can learn to “speak the language” of your school’s administrators and board members.  

Bottom line? If you understand FTE – as it relates to individuals and positions, as well as programs – you’ll be a stronger advocate for expansion or preservation of your school music program.

OK, get out your calculators and let’s get started! 

What is FTE & why is it so important?

FTE stands for "Full Time Equivalent," or one (1.0) full time teaching position. Your school defines each FTE position by a job classification or category (ie, teacher, administrator, staff, etc.). The definition of one (1.0) FTE is based on the district contract and input from your local teachers' organization.  

How do you calculate FTE?

You can calculate the FTE of any teacher by counting the number of classes he or she teaches each day. When you break it down this way, each class they teach also receives an FTE value. For example:

If 1.0 FTE teaches 5 classes per day, each class equals .2 FTE.

If 1.0 FTE teaches 6 classes per day, each class equals .17 FTE.

If 1.0 FTE teaches 3 classes per day, each class equals .33 FTE.

FTE may refer to both positions and individuals

An FTE value may be assigned to a position (band director) or an individual (Ms. Sanchez). That is, while Ms. Sanchez may be a full-time teacher (1.0 FTE), she may not necessarily work full-time in just one curricular area (band director) because she may also have other duties (such as study hall). The individual in the example below teaches full-time, but the music positions total only .6 FTE (highlighted in bold):

Teacher Load (Based on 1.0 FTE as 5 classes per day)

Period 1: Computer Science .2 FTE

Period 2: Concert Band  .2 FTE

Period 3: Study Hall .2 FTE

Period 4: Varsity Band .2 FTE

Period 5: Music Appreciation .2 FTE

 

Likewise, the position (band director) above is only .4 FTE. While the administration may perceive the district as having a full time band director, it is the individual (Ms. Sanchez) not the position (band director) that is full time.

Now can you begin to see how understanding this important distinction might help you develop stronger proposals to increase staffing or save a position?

FTE can be shared, too

Another very common situation is revealed by the following two examples. Here you’ll see how one (1.0) FTE elementary music position is shared by two individuals conducting classes at several schools. In example one below, both individuals are full time, but each position shares one-half of the elementary position. In example two, the 1.0 FTE elementary position is shared by two part-time individuals. In both examples, the elementary music position equals 1.0 FTE.

Example 1: Two full-time teachers sharing 1.0 FTE elementary position

Teacher 1 (1.0 FTE contract): 

Elementary Band (3 of 6 schools) .5 FTE

Middle School Band .5 FTE

Teacher 2 (1.0 FTE contract):

Elementary Band (3 of 6 schools) .5 FTE

High School Band .5 FTE

Example 2: Two part-time teachers sharing 1.0 FTE elementary position

Teacher 1 (.5 FTE contract)

Elementary Band (3 schools) .5 FTE

Teacher 2 (.5 FTE contract)

Elementary Band (3 schools) .5 FTE

A board’s eye view of part-time teachers

Your school board’s budget committee may see advantages to hiring part-time teachers, even though this may not always be in the best interest of music students or teachers. From the board’s perspective, the reasons for hiring part-time teachers may be financial:

  • benefits may not be required for part-time instructors
  • restrictions due to other budgetary decisions

or practical:

  • student enrollment may not justify a full time position

 some highly qualified teachers may be unable or unwilling to teach full time.

Here’s how FTE looks in a real budget

OK, you’ve learned quite a lot by now about FTE. Let’s take a look at how FTE impacts an actual budget summary.

In a typical example like the one below, the district may assume it has 37 full-time individuals teaching music. However, without doing a full analysis of FTE, they may have little or no knowledge of the actual distribution of those positions among the various components of the music curriculum. Consequently, if the administration proposes cuts in one or more curricular areas it will be up to you to demonstrate the actual effect (loss) of FTE in each curricular area.

The example states that there are currently 37 individuals on the music faculty in the school district comprising a total of 36.24 FTE positions. Assignments of FTE are broken down as follows.


Elementary General Music10.67
Elementary Band1.55
Elementary Orchestra2.08
Elementary Choir---
Middle School General Music2.65
Middle School Band3.37
Middle School Orchestra3.38
Middle School Choir4.11
High School General Music---
High School Band3.68
High School Orchestra1.54
High School Choir2.91
Non-music Assignments.30
Travel Time
Total36.24

 

Note: In this example, at least one individual was part-time. Notice that no FTE is allocated to elementary choral music or coordination of the music curriculum. Some individuals who work in multiple schools receive payment for "travel time" driving between schools: students lost instructional time, but the district had not factored in the loss of time in the classroom.

Asking the Right Questions Makes All The Difference

Are you asking some questions now that would simply not have occurred to you before? That’s great! As you move through the rest of this series on FTE, you’ll see more and more where – and how – you need to ask questions to evaluate just how much time a teacher actually spends on each area of the music curriculum. And, you’ll begin to understand how your district’s budget process works in relationship to the distribution of FTE.

Once you learn to ask the right questions – and understand how budgetary decisions impact students, teachers and curricular offerings - then your role as a music advocate can really have a positive impact!

In the next “Counterpoint” article in this FTE series, you’ll read a case study that shows how understanding FTE helped one school save a full time music teacher position during a budget crisis.

Until Next Time,
Dr. John Benham




Organizations:

Artists:

Scott Brady

Nathan East

The Goo Goo Dolls

Lorin Hollander

Bob James

Carolyn Dawn Johnson

Harvey Mason

Bob McGrath

Chris Pierce

Nate Sallie

Take 6

Will Turpin of Collective Soul


Contact Us