WWW WWW.SUPPORTMUSIC.COM

Download the NEW SupportMusic Glossary

May 01, 2008
FOCUS ON BUDGET: Reverse Economics – Developing a Fiscal Case for Your Music Program (Part 2 of 2)
April 02, 2008
FOCUS ON BUDGET: Reverse Economics - Developing a Fiscal Case for Your Music Program (Part 1 of 2)
March 01, 2008
Focus on Issues & Decision-making: Educational Reform Movements - Tax Vouchers and Their Impact on Music Education Programs
February 01, 2008
ARTS ADVOCACY LESSONS FROM THE 2008 IOWA PRESIDENTIAL CAUCUS: #1 Take-Away ñ Let the Candidates Hear From You!
January 03, 2008
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: NJ Arts Education Census Project Offers Model for Other States
December 01, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: Advocate for Music Education
October 30, 2007
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: Music Education Research 101, Part II
September 17, 2007
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: Music Education Research 101, Part 1
August 07, 2007
FOCUS ON ISSUES AND DECISIONMAKING: Do Your Elected Officials View Music Education as a National Priority?
July 13, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: American Symphony Orchestra League Launches Historic Statement of Common Cause to Support In-School Music Education
June 03, 2007
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Music & Arts Education is Essential to Development of Creative Economy & 21st Century Skills
June 03, 2007
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Music & Arts Education is Essential to Development of Creative Economy & 21st Century Skills
May 03, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: Think Globally, Act Locally ñ and Why Reading This is NOT an Advocacy Action
March 21, 2007
FOFCUS ON BUDGET: FTE and the Staffing Ratio, Part 2 ñ The Music Teacher
February 21, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: From Anytown, USA to Washington, DC . . . All Music Advocacy Is Local
January 17, 2007
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: How to Create School Board Support for Music Programs
December 15, 2006
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Why Music Technology Enhances Student Success
November 16, 2006
FOCUS ON COALITION BUILDING: These Parents Made A Difference ñ You Can Too!
October 18, 2006
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: The Study Hall Game
September 27, 2006
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: The Music Administrator, Part 2 of 2
September 20, 2006
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION MAKING: The Music Administrator, Part 1 of 2
September 08, 2006
Back-To-School Primer: The Local Music Coalition
August 30, 2006
Focus on Budget: FTE ñ A Case Study on Teacher Seniority & The Fallacy of Average
August 24, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making:Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 3 of 3
August 15, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making:Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 2 of 3
August 08, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 1 of 3
August 08, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 1 of 3
August 01, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Trimester System and Year-Round Schools
July 18, 2006
NEWS FLASH!! CA Advocates Secure Historic Funding for Arts Education
June 30, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 10 of a series Decision Time!
June 22, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 9 of a series Three Perspectives on Block Scheduling
June 13, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 8 of a series Two Options for Four-Period Block Scheduling
June 06, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 7 of a series Block Scheduling and the Music Student
May 30, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 6 of a series Rotating Schedules
May 18, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 5 of a series Two Options for 7-Period Scheduling
May 08, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 4 of a series Scheduling Myths & the Grades 9-10 "Bottleneck"
April 27, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform movement: Part 3 of a series Scheduling & The Traditional Six-Day Period
April 19, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform: Part 2 of a series Scheduling
April 12, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Educational Reform Movements: Part 1 of a series An Overview & Some Advice
April 04, 2006
FOCUS ON BUDGET: Actual FTE Value & Individual Student Load
March 27, 2006
PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS: A Slippery Slope
March 15, 2006
Music Advocacy 101: Do YOU Have "The Right Stuff"?
March 01, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Who Really Calls The Shots?
February 16, 2006
Focus on Budget: FTE and The Danger of Using Averages
February 07, 2006
Focus on Budget: Identifying Potential & "Hidden" Music Budget Cuts
January 24, 2006
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Music - Curricular, Co-curricular or Extra-curricular?
January 10, 2006
Focus on Budget: FTE and the Staffing Ratio
January 04, 2006
Focus on Students: Advocacy and the Music Student
December 27, 2005
Focus on Budget: How to Develop & Use Impact Statements
December 20, 2005
FOCUS ON ISSUES & DECISION-MAKING: Central and Site-based Management
December 05, 2005
Focus on Budget: How "Average" FTE Value Creates Budget Problems
November 28, 2005
Focus on Coalition Building: The Public School Music Participation Survey
November 21, 2005
Focus on Coalition Building: 8 Strategic Errors in Music Advocacy & How to Correct Them
November 14, 2005
Focus on Issues & Decision Making: Is My Music Program Vulnerable to Cuts?
November 07, 2005
Focus on Budget: FTE & Staffing
October 31, 2005
FOCUS ON STUDENTS: Putting Students First
October 10, 2005
Decision Making: The Politics of Process
October 04, 2005
SCHOOL BUDGET PRIMER: UNDERSTANDING "FTE"
March 23, 2005
Decisions: Adult or Student-centered?
March 23, 2005
Decisions: Adult or Student-centered?

August 15,2006

Educational Reform Movements: Middle Schools, Part 2

In Part 1 , we took a brief look at the middle school concept of education. In this segment of my three-part series, you'll read about some of the potential positive and negativ e impacts the middle school concept may have on music programs.

Whenever a group of concerned parents of music students contacts me about impending changes, I ask a few basic questions:

1. Who is the individual or group leading the reform effort?
2. What are the obvious and hidden agendas?
3. What are the potential negative effects of the change?
4. Is it possible to improve your music program by putting the proposed reform in place?

(For more insight, you may want to review the advice given and issues raised in the first article in my 10-part series on educational reform movements. )

Secondary Motivations

I have found that new administrator(s) in the district are leading the charge behind most efforts at educational reform. However, in the case of middle schools, the two most obvious secondary motivators are the need to alleviate overcrowding by moving students to buildings where there is more space available, and the attempt to reduce costs in programs perceived to be expensive.

Unfortunately, the elementary music program is usually the first targeted for reduction or elimination.

This chart summarizes several typical administrative proposals to reduce or eliminate components of the music curriculum; it also details their rationale and "hidden" motivations for doing so:


Proposed Music Cut

Administrative Rationale

"Hidden" Motivation

Eliminate Elementary Choral Music
  • Students can still start in the middle school with minimal effect
  • Could become part of the general music curriculum
  • Perceived cost savings from cut positions
  • Eliminate complaints about "pull-outs" from elementary classroom teachers
  • Proposed cuts often come here first, because they will produce the least amount of complaints from parents, especially if placed into the general music curriculum
  • Eliminate Elementary Orchestra
  • Students can still start in the middle school with minimal effect
  • Perceived cost savings from cut positions
  • Eliminate complaints about "pull-outs" from elementary classroom teachers
  • Proposed cuts often come here next, because they will produce the least amount of complaints from parents
  • Eliminate Elementary Band
  • Students can still start in the middle school with minimal effect
  • Perceived cost savings from cut positions
  • Eliminate complaints about "pull-outs" from elementary classroom teachers
  • Proposed cuts come here next, because they will produce the least amount of complaints from parents
  • Eliminate Elementary General Music
  • Program is not perceived as curricular, but primarily as a means of providing "prep" time for classroom teachers
  • Perceived cost savings from cut positions
  • Proposed cuts often come here last because of anticipated protests from classroom teachers
  • Some districts have eliminated all "specialist" teachers, moved classroom teacher "prep" time to the end of the day, and sent the students home an hour earlier
  • Reduce Middle School General Music to six or nine week exploratory "wheel"
  • Program is not perceived as curricular, but minimal inclusion still fulfills state "guidelines" for music education; further, guidelines are non-binding
  • Provide exploratory programs to broaden interests for students
  • Perceived cost savings from cut positions
  • "These kids aren't going to be music majors anyway"
  • Reduce music performance (band, choir, orchestra) from daily to every-other-day classes
  • Program is not perceived as curricular.
  • Music performance is only for the "talented few"
  • Perceived cost savings from cut positions
  • "These kids aren't going to be music majors anyway!"


  • The Music Issues

    So you're faced with one or more of the proposals above. What do you do?

    Here are some interesting facts and ideas you may find useful.

    1. After more than 25 years, our research with national case studies indicates that when a district eliminates even one year, i.e., grade five, of the elementary (instrumental) music curriculum, there will be a minimum loss of 65% of the enrollment at the middle school level within two years.

    2. When considering proposed changes, you can try to assess potential impacts on the middle school music curriculum by asking for answers to the following questions:
    a. Will the new format allow for curricular diversity (for example, will there be separate classes for male and female singers as well as mixed choirs)?
    b. Will the new format enable placement of students by skill level (for example, will it enable adequate individualized instruction to meet the needs of gifted or remedial students)?
    c. Will the new format provide for small group homogeneous instruction for beginning, intermediate and advanced students?
    d. If the first year of instruction is delayed until middle school, what measures will be put in place to provide adequate instruction to beginning students? Obviously, the placement of 50-60 beginning students playing as many as ten different instrum ents in a single classroom is far from "best practices," and will most certainly increase attrition.
    e. Will enough music faculty be available to provide for "team" instruction in music?
    f. Will daily rehearsals be facilitated, or will instruction be reduced to every other day? [Tip: One school district has successfully taken advantage of the "wheel" by scheduling individual courses for instruction on homogenous instruments. Students participating in band or orchestra are required to enroll in the "wheel" course that includes their instrument.]

    Strong Music Programs in Middle Schools

    Here are three other items that will help you maintain the strength of your music program if your district is considering, or has already adopted, the middle school concept:

    1. A sequential, written curriculum with specific, achievable and measurable goals, and a system of assessment will provide your district with relevant data and assist you in demonstrating your music program's viability as a curricular entity. This in formation will be extremely important to your coalition as advocates try to preserve the integrity of your district's music programming and improve its delivery.

    2. Other than a well-organized music coalition , there is probably no greater relationship for you to establish than the one with the guidance counselors. Make every effort to d emonstrate your credibility as an educator or concerned parent by providing all the guidance counselors in your district with appropriate information on the importance of making music.

    3. And remember: ALWAYS keep the focus on the student–it is their program!

    Next time, you'll read a case study of one district that successfully made the transition to the middle school concept while also making improvements in its music program.

    Until then,

    John Benham





    Organizations:

    Artists:

    Scott Brady

    Nathan East

    The Goo Goo Dolls

    Lorin Hollander

    Bob James

    Carolyn Dawn Johnson

    Harvey Mason

    Bob McGrath

    Chris Pierce

    Nate Sallie

    Take 6

    Will Turpin of Collective Soul


    Contact Us